Trace:
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
frank_tenenbaum_2011 [2016/02/06 20:21] – silvia | frank_tenenbaum_2011 [2016/02/08 15:48] (current) – silvia | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 401: | Line 401: | ||
and tokens (Goldwater et al., 2006; Johnson, Griffiths, & | and tokens (Goldwater et al., 2006; Johnson, Griffiths, & | ||
Goldwater, 2007). | Goldwater, 2007). | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | Finally, though the domain-general principles we have | ||
+ | identified here do capture many results, there is some | ||
+ | additional evidence for domain-specific effects. Learners | ||
+ | may acquire expectations for the kinds of regularities that | ||
+ | appear in domains like music compared with those that | ||
+ | appear in speech (Dawson & Gerken, 2009); in addition, a | ||
+ | number of papers have described a striking dissociation | ||
+ | between the kinds of regularities that can be learned from | ||
+ | vowels and those that can be learned from consonants | ||
+ | (Bonatti, Peña, Nespor, & Mehler, 2005; Toro, Nespor, | ||
+ | Mehler, & Bonatti, 2008). Both sets of results point to a | ||
+ | need for a hierarchical approach to rule learning, in which | ||
+ | knowledge of what kinds of regularities are possible in a | ||
+ | domain can itself be learned from the evidence. Only | ||
+ | through further empirical and computational work can | ||
+ | we understand which of these effects can be explained | ||
+ | through acquired domain expectations and which are best | ||
+ | explained as innate domain-specific biases or constraints. | ||
\\ | \\ |